On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 09:31:28AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > -           unsigned long, fd, off_t, off)
> > +           unsigned long, fd, off_t, pgoff)
> >  {
> > +   unsigned long off = pgoff;
> > +
> 
> Would loff_t be better?

I don't think so, isn't that still signed? I also think it's the same
size as off_t on arm64 (long long vs long).

Will

Reply via email to