+ Brijesh.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> The first kmemleak_scan() after boot would trigger a crash below because
>
> kernel_init
> free_initmem
> mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem
> free_init_pages
>
> unmapped some memory inside the .bss.
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffbd402000
> CPU: 12 PID: 325 Comm: kmemleak Not tainted 5.1.0-rc4+ #4
> RIP: 0010:scan_block+0x58/0x160
> Call Trace:
> scan_gray_list+0x1d9/0x280
> kmemleak_scan+0x485/0xad0
> kmemleak_scan_thread+0x9f/0xc4
> kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0
> ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> index 385afa2b9e17..614ab156024f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> #include <linux/swiotlb.h>
> #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
> +#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
> @@ -369,6 +370,11 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Inform kmemleak about the hole in the .bss section since the
> + * corresponding pages will be unmapped with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y.
> + */
> + kmemleak_free_part((void *)vaddr, vaddr_end - vaddr);
> free_init_pages("unused decrypted", vaddr, vaddr_end);
I don't understand what the logic here is: we have a couple of other
free_init_pages() calls but they don't have kmemleak_free_part() in
front.
Now, if kmemleak needs to be told that memory is getting freed, why
isn't kmemleak_free_part() called in free_init_pages() ?
This needs more explanation.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
