Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we fix the compiler, please, to say that *every* case (perhaps barring > > the last) is expected to fall through?
I should say "... so that we can say that *every* case ...". David
Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we fix the compiler, please, to say that *every* case (perhaps barring > > the last) is expected to fall through?
I should say "... so that we can say that *every* case ...". David