On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:46:41 +0200
Vitor Soares <vitor.soa...@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Currently in case of mixed slow bus topologie and all i2c devices
> support FM+ speed, the i3c subsystem limite the SCL to FM speed.
"
Currently the I3C framework limits SCL frequency to FM speed when
dealing with a mixed slow bus, even if all I2C devices are FM+ capable.
"
> Also in case on mixed slow bus mode the max speed for both
> i2c or i3c transfers is FM or FM+.
Looks like you're basically repeating what you said above.
>
> This patch fix the definition of i2c and i3c scl rate based on bus
^fixes on the bus
> topologie and LVR[4] if no user input.
^topology ^if the rate is not already specified by the user.
> In case of mixed slow mode the i3c scl rate is overridden.
^ with the max
I2C rate.
>
> Fixes: 3a379bbcea0a ("i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soa...@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezil...@kernel.org>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/i3c/master.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 909c2ad..1c4a86a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -564,20 +564,30 @@ static const struct device_type i3c_masterdev_type = {
> .groups = i3c_masterdev_groups,
> };
>
> -int i3c_bus_set_mode(struct i3c_bus *i3cbus, enum i3c_bus_mode mode)
> +int i3c_bus_set_mode(struct i3c_bus *i3cbus, enum i3c_bus_mode mode,
> + unsigned long i2c_scl_rate)
Can we rename the last arg into max_i2c_scl_rate?
> {
> i3cbus->mode = mode;
>
> - if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c)
> - i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = I3C_BUS_TYP_I3C_SCL_RATE;
> -
> - if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c) {
> - if (i3cbus->mode == I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW)
> - i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_SCL_RATE;
> - else
> - i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE;
> + switch (i3cbus->mode) {
> + case I3C_BUS_MODE_PURE:
> + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c)
> + i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = I3C_BUS_TYP_I3C_SCL_RATE;
> + break;
> + case I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_FAST:
> + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c)
> + i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = I3C_BUS_TYP_I3C_SCL_RATE;
> + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c)
> + i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = i2c_scl_rate;
> + break;
> + case I3C_BUS_MODE_MIXED_SLOW:
> + if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c)
> + i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c = i2c_scl_rate;
> + i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c;
Maybe we should do
if (!i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c ||
i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c > i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c)
i3cbus->scl_rate.i3c = i3cbus->scl_rate.i2c;
Just in case the I3C rate forced by the user is lower than the max I2C
rate.
The patch looks good otherwise.
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> /*
> * I3C/I2C frequency may have been overridden, check that user-provided
> * values are not exceeding max possible frequency.
> @@ -1980,9 +1990,6 @@ of_i3c_master_add_i2c_boardinfo(struct
> i3c_master_controller *master,
> /* LVR is encoded in reg[2]. */
> boardinfo->lvr = reg[2];
>
> - if (boardinfo->lvr & I3C_LVR_I2C_FM_MODE)
> - master->bus.scl_rate.i2c = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_SCL_RATE;
> -
> list_add_tail(&boardinfo->node, &master->boardinfo.i2c);
> of_node_get(node);
>
> @@ -2432,6 +2439,7 @@ int i3c_master_register(struct i3c_master_controller
> *master,
> const struct i3c_master_controller_ops *ops,
> bool secondary)
> {
> + unsigned long i2c_scl_rate = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_PLUS_SCL_RATE;
> struct i3c_bus *i3cbus = i3c_master_get_bus(master);
> enum i3c_bus_mode mode = I3C_BUS_MODE_PURE;
> struct i2c_dev_boardinfo *i2cbi;
> @@ -2481,9 +2489,12 @@ int i3c_master_register(struct i3c_master_controller
> *master,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto err_put_dev;
> }
> +
> + if (i2cbi->lvr & I3C_LVR_I2C_FM_MODE)
> + i2c_scl_rate = I3C_BUS_I2C_FM_SCL_RATE;
> }
>
> - ret = i3c_bus_set_mode(i3cbus, mode);
> + ret = i3c_bus_set_mode(i3cbus, mode, i2c_scl_rate);
> if (ret)
> goto err_put_dev;
>
