On Aug 15 2007 10:37, Rene Herman wrote: > On 08/15/2007 09:28 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote: > >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > > NULL is not 0 though. >> > It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero, >> >> C guarantees that. > > C guarantees what? If you're disagreeing with Jason -- he's right.
http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/C_CPP/comp.lang.c/2003-11/1808.html >> > but the constant value 0 when used in pointer context is always a >> > null pointer (and in fact the standard requires that NULL be >> > #defined as 0 or a cast thereof). Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
