On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 04:56:37PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> proc_mounts.m.buf is not explicitly zeroed at allocation time, which
> may later confuse the seqfile code and triggle an kfree(m->buf).

It's weird it did not show up in real world.  Could I be wrong?

> --- linux.orig/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ linux/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int mounts_open(struct inode *ino
>  
>       if (ns) {
>               ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             p = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_mounts), GFP_KERNEL);
> +             p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct proc_mounts), GFP_KERNEL);
>               if (p) {
>                       file->private_data = &p->m;
>                       ret = seq_open(file, &mounts_op);
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to