Kees Cook <keesc...@google.com> wrote: > These look good to me. Gets us another step to finishing this. :)
Can we fix the compiler, please, to say that *every* case (perhaps barring the last) is expected to fall through? David
Kees Cook <keesc...@google.com> wrote: > These look good to me. Gets us another step to finishing this. :)
Can we fix the compiler, please, to say that *every* case (perhaps barring the last) is expected to fall through? David