On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:32 PM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: > > > The architecture specific information of the running processes could > > be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture > > specific information externally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com> > > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> > > This really lacks > > Cc: Linux API <linux-...@vger.kernel.org> > Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobri...@gmail.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > > Cc'ed now. >
I certainly understand why you want to expose this info, but would it make more sense to instead add an arch_status file in /proc with architecture-specific info? Or maybe an x86_status field for x86 status, etc.
