> On Apr 1, 2019, at 5:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:06:53AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:20:04AM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote:
>>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
>>> index bc6d3244e1af..71ee4b64c5d4 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
>>> +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
>>> @@ -17,8 +17,18 @@
>>> 
>>> struct mcs_spinlock {
>>>     struct mcs_spinlock *next;
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS
>>>     int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
>>>     int count;  /* nesting count, see qspinlock.c */
>>> +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS */
>>> +   uintptr_t locked; /* 1 if lock acquired, 0 if not, other values */
>>> +                     /* represent a pointer to the secondary queue head */
>>> +   u32 node_and_count;     /* node id on which this thread is running */
>>> +                           /* with two lower bits reserved for nesting */
>>> +                           /* count, see qspinlock.c */
>>> +   u32 encoded_tail; /* encoding of this node as the main queue tail */
>>> +   struct mcs_spinlock *tail;    /* points to the secondary queue tail */
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS */
>>> };
>> 
>> Please, have another look at the paravirt code, in particular at struct
>> pv_node and its usage. This is horrible.
> 
> Thing is, this turns into a right mess when you also have PV spinlocks
> on.
> 
> One thing we could maybe do is change locked and count to u8, then your
> overlay structure could be something like:
> 
> struct mcs_spinlock {
>       struct mcs_spinlock *next;
>       u8 locked;
>       u8 count;
> };
I was trying to keep the size of the mcs_spinlock structure for the non-NUMA 
variant unchanged.
If this is not a huge concern, changing the fields as above would indeed 
simplify a few things.

— Alex 

> 
> struct cna_node {
>       /* struct mcs_spinlock overlay */
>       struct mcs_spinlock *next;
>       u8 locked;
>       u8 count;
> 
>       /* our CNA bits, consuming the slack and PV space */
>       u16 node;
>       u32 encoded_tail;
>       struct mcs_spinlock *head;
>       struct mcs_spinlock *tail;
> };
> 
> Then you also don't need the first two patches.

Reply via email to