On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:43:29AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:19:46PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >  static bool in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info 
> > *info)
> >  {
> > -   unsigned long estacks, begin, end, stk = (unsigned long)stack;
> > +   unsigned long begin, end, stk = (unsigned long)stack;
> > +   const struct estack_pages *ep;
> >     struct pt_regs *regs;
> >     unsigned int k;
> >  
> >     BUILD_BUG_ON(N_EXCEPTION_STACKS != 4);
> >  
> > -   estacks = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
> > -
> > -   for (k = 0; k < N_EXCEPTION_STACKS; k++) {
> > -           begin = estacks + layout[k].begin;
> > -           end   = estacks + layout[k].end;
> > -           regs  = (struct pt_regs *)end - 1;
> > -
> > -           if (stk <= begin || stk >= end)
> > -                   continue;
> > -
> > -           info->type      = STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION + k;
> > -           info->begin     = (unsigned long *)begin;
> > -           info->end       = (unsigned long *)end;
> > -           info->next_sp   = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> > -
> > -           return true;
> > -   }
> > -
> > -   return false;
> > +   begin = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
> > +   end = begin + sizeof(struct cea_exception_stacks);
> > +   /* Bail if @stack is outside the exception stack area. */
> > +   if (stk <= begin || stk >= end)
> > +           return false;
> 
> This check is the most important piece.  Exception stack dumps are quite
> rare, so this ensures an early exit in most cases regardless of whether
> there's a loop below.
> 
> > +
> > +   /* Calc page offset from start of exception stacks */
> > +   k = (stk - begin) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +   /* Lookup the page descriptor */
> > +   ep = &estack_pages[k];
> > +   /* Guard page? */
> > +   if (unlikely(!ep->size))
> > +           return false;
> > +
> > +   begin += (unsigned long)ep->offs;
> > +   end = begin + (unsigned long)ep->size;
> > +   regs = (struct pt_regs *)end - 1;
> > +
> > +   info->type      = ep->type;
> > +   info->begin     = (unsigned long *)begin;
> > +   info->end       = (unsigned long *)end;
> > +   info->next_sp   = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> > +   return true;
> 
> With the above "(stk <= begin || stk >= end)" check, removing the loop
> becomes not all that important since exception stack dumps are quite
> rare and not performance sensitive.  With all the macros this code
> becomes a little more obtuse, so I'm not sure whether removal of the
> loop is a net positive.

Are you sure; perf does a lot of stack dumps from NMI context.

Reply via email to