On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:03:51PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> When VMExit occurs, the Guest CET MSRs are stored in two different
> places, U_CET/PL0_SSP/PL1_SSP/PL2_SSP/PL3_SSP are stored in fpu
> xsave area, they are operated by XSAVES/XRSTORS, so before access
> these MSRs, kvm_load_guest_fpu is required to restore them to Host MSRs.
> After finish operation, need to restore Host MSRs by kvm_put_guest_fpu,
> these two functions are call in __msr_io(). S_CET and INTR_SSP_TABLE
> are stored in VMCS fields, so they can be access via vmcs_read/vmcs_write
> directly.

Hmm, the changelog reads like the kvm_load_guest_fpu() behavior is
introduced in this patch.  It should be reworded to make it more obvious
that a previous patch handled that behavior.  Alternatively, just fold
this into said previous patch.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.y...@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c               | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h 
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 298721ff00f4..cc94ab14a946 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -782,6 +782,8 @@
>  #define MSR_IA32_U_CET               0x6a0 /* user mode cet setting */
>  #define MSR_IA32_S_CET               0x6a2 /* kernel mode cet setting */
>  #define MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP     0x6a4 /* kernel shstk pointer */
> +#define MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP     0x6a5 /* ring 1 shstk pointer */
> +#define MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP     0x6a6 /* ring 2 shstk pointer */
>  #define MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP     0x6a7 /* user shstk pointer */
>  #define MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB 0x6a8 /* exception shstk table */
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 816e11a66557..5923b89fe120 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4153,6 +4153,27 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
> msr_data *msr_info)
>                       return 1;
>               msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.ia32_xss;
>               break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_S_CET:
> +             msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_S_CET);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, msr_info->data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
> +             msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP:
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, msr_info->data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP:
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP, msr_info->data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP:
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP, msr_info->data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> +             rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, msr_info->data);
> +             break;
>       case MSR_TSC_AUX:
>               if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
>                   !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
> @@ -4337,6 +4358,27 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
> msr_data *msr_info)
>               else
>                       clear_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_IA32_XSS);
>               break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_S_CET:
> +             vmcs_writel(GUEST_S_CET, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
> +             wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_U_CET, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
> +             vmcs_writel(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP:
> +             wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP:
> +             wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP:
> +             wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP, data);
> +             break;
> +     case MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP:
> +             wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, data);
> +             break;
>       case MSR_TSC_AUX:
>               if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
>                   !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to