On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 3:10 PM Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> d8ba61ba58c8 ("x86/entry/64: Don't use IST entry for #BP stack") removed
> the last user but left the macro around.
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,6 @@ struct idt_data {
> #define ISTG(_vector, _addr, _ist) \
> G(_vector, _addr, _ist, GATE_INTERRUPT, DPL0, __KERNEL_CS)
>
> -/* System interrupt gate with interrupt stack */
> -#define SISTG(_vector, _addr, _ist) \
> - G(_vector, _addr, _ist, GATE_INTERRUPT, DPL3, __KERNEL_CS)
> -
> /* Task gate */
> #define TSKG(_vector, _gdt) \
> G(_vector, NULL, DEFAULT_STACK, GATE_TASK, DPL0, _gdt << 3)
>
>
