On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:21:10 +0200, Jan Engelhardt said: > > On Aug 14 2007 00:02, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > >Better solution is to have multiple MAINTAINERS files distributed in the > >kernel tree, IMHO -- say a drivers/net/MAINTAINERS for maintainer info on > >all various net drivers, drivers/kvm/MAINTAINERS for KVM maintainer info, > >fs/ext3/MAINTAINERS for ext3 maintainers, fs/MAINTAINERS for generic VFS > >maintainers info, so on and so forth. Of course, these individual > >MAINTAINERS files could still have the newly-introduced "F:" fields as > >well (drivers/net/MAINTAINERS would clearly require it, f.e.) ... > > Yes please. > > Or perhaps even putting the maintainer into the Kconfig files?
There's large swaths of code that don't have an obvious Kconfig entry but do have a Maintainer entry - VFS, lots of kernel/*, and so on.
pgpzrQjNVORss.pgp
Description: PGP signature
