4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 20589c8cc47dce5854c8bf1b44a9fc63d798d26d ]

Failing to properly reset system registers is pretty bad. But not
quite as bad as bringing the whole machine down... So warn loudly,
but slightly more gracefully.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c     | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
index cb094e55dc5f..fd6cde23bb5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
@@ -1450,6 +1450,6 @@ void kvm_reset_coprocs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        reset_coproc_regs(vcpu, table, num);
 
        for (num = 1; num < NR_CP15_REGS; num++)
-               if (vcpu_cp15(vcpu, num) == 0x42424242)
-                       panic("Didn't reset vcpu_cp15(vcpu, %zi)", num);
+               WARN(vcpu_cp15(vcpu, num) == 0x42424242,
+                    "Didn't reset vcpu_cp15(vcpu, %zi)", num);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 22fbbdbece3c..fe18e68f9a20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2586,7 +2586,9 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num);
        reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, table, num);
 
-       for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)
-               if (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
-                       panic("Didn't reset __vcpu_sys_reg(%zi)", num);
+       for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++) {
+               if (WARN(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242,
+                        "Didn't reset __vcpu_sys_reg(%zi)\n", num))
+                       break;
+       }
 }
-- 
2.19.1



Reply via email to