On 19/03/19 9:13 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:01:13PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:11:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:02:53PM +0200, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>>>> This makes it easier to use pcitest in automated setups.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhib...@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/pci/pcitest.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/pci/pcitest.c b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
>>>> index af146bb..5adc8cd 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/pci/pcitest.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
>>>> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> fflush(stdout);
>>>> + return (ret < 0) ? ret : 1 - ret; /* return 0 if test succeeded */
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> @@ -231,6 +232,5 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - run_test(test);
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + return run_test(test);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>
>>> are you OK with this patch ? Please let me know.
>>
>> Please let me know, I need your ACK on this to queue it.
>
> Hi Kishon,
>
> I will merge this patch unless you have something against it,
> please let me know.
Sorry for missing this earlier.
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
