On 12/08/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 12 August 2007 7:48:37 am Stefan Richter wrote: > > Isn't it with 00-INDEX just like with the "Last Updated:" footers in > > documentation texts? > > > > They are metadata which will be almost always out of date. > > If nothing is using them, they'll bit-rot, yes. Way of the world. But I've > found a use for them. Therefore, I'm interested in getting them up to date > and then keeping them there.
So, do you want me to create more of these? If you want them, could you perhaps start by ACK'ing the first 5 patches to help me get them merged? Once I see the first 5 merged I'll start creating more, but I don't want to waste time doing so before that. >I already wrote an automatic checker to tell me > how they differ from reality, which is half the battle. I started writing such a script myself yesterday, but it's not done yet. If you already have one that works could I have a copy please? That would make my life easier if I'm to help you with this. -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
