Hi,

On 01/03/2019 05:06, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Currently dwc host doesn't support the remove, but nothing prevent us
> from supporting it. Save the root bus for clean up work in driver
> remove code path.
> 
> After this patch, the dwc host users could implement its remove as:
> 
> static int foo_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
>       ...
>       pci_stop_root_bus(pp->root_bus);
>       pci_remove_root_bus(pp->root_bus);
>       dw_pcie_free_msi(pp);
>       ...
> }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jisheng.zh...@synaptics.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h      | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 4831c12fee93..ca45a4471ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>               goto err_free_msi;
>  
>       bus = bridge->bus;
> +     pp->root_bus = bus;

Why you don't use from the begging the pp->root_bus variable instead of bus
variable? That way we can remove the bus variable.

Regards,
Gustavo

>  
>       if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>               pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 3be7ca9f1fc3..cd92ded606c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ struct pcie_port {
>       struct page             *msi_page;
>       u32                     num_vectors;
>       u32                     irq_mask[MAX_MSI_CTRLS];
> +     struct pci_bus          *root_bus;
>       raw_spinlock_t          lock;
>       DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
>  };
> 

Reply via email to