Both branches of the if statement do exactly the same thing, just at
different offsets. Simplify the code a bit by moving shared action
code outside of the if statement. No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>
Cc: Chris Healy <cphe...@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-...@nxp.com
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
index 2ea17870e9da..bb35cedd05e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c
@@ -85,17 +85,15 @@ static int vf610_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned 
int gpio)
 {
        struct vf610_gpio_port *port = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
        unsigned long mask = BIT(gpio);
-       void __iomem *addr;
+       unsigned long offset = GPIO_PDIR;
 
        if (port->sdata && port->sdata->have_paddr) {
                mask &= vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDDR);
-               addr = mask ? port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDOR :
-                             port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDIR;
-               return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(addr) & BIT(gpio));
-       } else {
-               return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + GPIO_PDIR)
-                                          & BIT(gpio));
+               if (mask)
+                       offset = GPIO_PDOR;
        }
+
+       return !!(vf610_gpio_readl(port->gpio_base + offset) & BIT(gpio));
 }
 
 static void vf610_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to