On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 16:31:40 -0600 Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't think it's really necessary - it's not used in a key so > > don't care about anything after the null, and TASK_COMM_LEN is used > > in > > the memcpy. > > Never mind, yeah, it would make sense to do this, will create another > patch... And probably should change the memcpy() of comm in kernel/trace/trace.c too. It could be that memcpy() is a little bit faster than strncpy(), and this is done on scheduling switches when tracing is active, but still, I'm starting to think that isn't a good choice. -- Steve
