On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:32:24AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/25/19 10:21 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
> >> On 2019/2/26 3:17, David Rientjes wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ok, what about just moving the calculation/check inside the lock as in 
> >>>> the
> >>>> untested patch below?
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >>>
> >>> Looks good; Jing, could you test that this fixes your case?
> >>
> >> Yes, I have tested this patch, it can also fix my case.
> > 
> > Great!
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangf...@huawei.com>
> > Tested-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangf...@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
> 
> Thanks Jing and David!
> 
> Here is the patch with an updated commit message and above tags:
> 
> From: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:43:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node specific
> nr_hugepages
> 
> The number of node specific huge pages can be set via a file such as:
> /sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
> When a node specific value is specified, the global number of huge
> pages must also be adjusted.  This adjustment is calculated as the
> specified node specific value + (global value - current node value).
> If the node specific value provided by the user is large enough, this
> calculation could overflow an unsigned long leading to a smaller
> than expected number of huge pages.
> 
> To fix, check the calculation for overflow.  If overflow is detected,
> use ULONG_MAX as the requested value.  This is inline with the user
> request to allocate as many huge pages as possible.
> 
> It was also noticed that the above calculation was done outside the
> hugetlb_lock.  Therefore, the values could be inconsistent and result
> in underflow.  To fix, the calculation is moved to within the routine
> set_max_huge_pages() where the lock is held.
> 
> Reported-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangf...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangf...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>

Looks good to me with improved comments.
Thanks everyone.

Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com>

> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index b37e3100b7cc..a7e4223d2df5 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h,
> nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
>  }
> 
>  #define persistent_huge_pages(h) (h->nr_huge_pages - h->surplus_huge_pages)
> -static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> +static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>                                               nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>  {
>       unsigned long min_count, ret;
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,23 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, 
> unsigned
> long count,
>               goto decrease_pool;
>       }
> 
> +     spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Check for a node specific request.  Adjust global count, but
> +      * restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
> +      */
> +     if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> +             unsigned long old_count = count;
> +             count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
> +             /*
> +              * If user specified count causes overflow, set to
> +              * largest possible value.
> +              */
> +             if (count < old_count)
> +                     count = ULONG_MAX;
> +     }
> +
>       /*
>        * Increase the pool size
>        * First take pages out of surplus state.  Then make up the
> @@ -2300,7 +2317,6 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned
> long count,
>        * pool might be one hugepage larger than it needs to be, but
>        * within all the constraints specified by the sysctls.
>        */
> -     spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>       while (h->surplus_huge_pages && count > persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
>               if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, -1))
>                       break;
> @@ -2421,16 +2437,18 @@ static ssize_t __nr_hugepages_store_common(bool
> obey_mempolicy,
>                       nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
>               }
>       } else if (nodes_allowed) {
> +             /* Node specific request */
> +             init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
> +     } else {
>               /*
> -              * per node hstate attribute: adjust count to global,
> -              * but restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
> +              * Node specific request, but we could not allocate
> +              * node mask.  Pass in ALL nodes, and clear nid.
>                */
> -             count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
> -             init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
> -     } else
> +             nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>               nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
> +     }
> 
> -     err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nodes_allowed);
> +     err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nid, nodes_allowed);
>       if (err)
>               goto out;
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 
> 

Reply via email to