On 2/27/2019 5:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:11:07PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

+       abstime_tmp = abstime_ostr;
data__for_each_file(i, d) {
-               d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &tool);
+               d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &pdiff.tool);
                if (!d->session) {
                        pr_err("Failed to open %s\n", d->data.path);
                        ret = -1;
                        goto out_delete;
                }
+ if (abstime_ostr) {
+                       ret = parse_absolute_time(d, &abstime_tmp);
+                       if (ret < 0)
+                               goto out_delete;
+               } else if (pdiff.time_str) {
+                       ret = parse_percent_time(d);
+                       if (ret < 0)
+                               goto out_delete;
+               } else {
+                       pdiff.range_num = 1;

hum, why are we setting range_num to 1 again?

Yes, that may be not necessary. I will remove this line and test again.


it's really hard to parse this code, maybe
it'd be better in separate loop/function
that would setup just timestamps..


Do you mean the above parsing code should be put in a separate function (e.g. parse_time_string in following example)?

data__for_each_file(i, d) {
        ....
        d->session = perf_session__new(&d->data, false, &pdiff.tool);
        ....
        parse_time_string(...);
        ret = perf_session__process_events(d->session);
        ....
}

Thanks
Jin Yao


thanks,
jirka

Reply via email to