Some people writing boot loaders seem to falsely belief the 32bit zero page is
a
stable interface for out of tree code like the real mode boot protocol. Add a
comment
clarifying that is not true.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Index: linux/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt
+++ linux/Documentation/i386/zero-page.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!WARNING!!!!!!!!
+The zero page is a kernel internal data structure, not a stable ABI. It might
change
+without warning and the kernel has no way to detect old version of it.
+If you're writing some external code like a boot loader you should only use
+the stable versioned real mode boot protocol described in boot.txt. Otherwise
the kernel
+might break you at any time.
+!!!!!!!!!!!!!WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
Summary of boot_params layout (kernel point of view)
( collected by Hans Lermen and Martin Mares )
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
