On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:56:27AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
> 
> v1: From: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
> 
> v2: cleanups, remove a branch.
> 
> [peterx writes up the commit message, as below...]
> 
> This patch introduces the new uffd-wp APIs for userspace.
> 
> Firstly, we'll allow to do UFFDIO_REGISTER with write protection
> tracking using the new UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP flag.  Note that this
> flag can co-exist with the existing UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, in
> which case the userspace program can not only resolve missing page
> faults, and at the same time tracking page data changes along the way.
> 
> Secondly, we introduced the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT API to do page
> level write protection tracking.  Note that we will need to register
> the memory region with UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP before that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
> [peterx: remove useless block, write commit message, check against
>  VM_MAYWRITE rather than VM_WRITE when register]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>

I am not an expert with userfaultfd code but it looks good to me so:

Also see my question down below, just a minor one.

Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>

> ---
>  fs/userfaultfd.c                 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 11 +++++
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 

[...]

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h 
> b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> index 297cb044c03f..1b977a7a4435 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  #define _UFFDIO_WAKE                 (0x02)
>  #define _UFFDIO_COPY                 (0x03)
>  #define _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE             (0x04)
> +#define _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT         (0x06)
>  #define _UFFDIO_API                  (0x3F)

What did happen to ioctl 0x05 ? :)

Reply via email to