On 2/18/19 5:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 18-02-19 16:47:26, Rong Chen wrote:
On 2/18/19 3:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 18-02-19 13:28:23, kernel test robot wrote:
[...]
[ 40.305212] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 40.313055] CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-00149-gefad4e4
#1
[ 40.321348] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
[ 40.330813] RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80
[ 40.335709] Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 5b 5d c3 0f 1f
44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 da <48> 8b 53 08 48
8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48
[ 40.356704] RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 40.362714] RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 000000000000000a
[ 40.370798] RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff88801e5c0000
[ 40.378830] RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 0000000001b64d13
[ 40.386902] R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88801e640000
[ 40.395033] R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 40.403138] FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 40.412243] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 40.418846] CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
[ 40.426951] Call Trace:
[ 40.429843] __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0
[ 40.433947] is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0
This looks like we are stumbling over an unitialized struct page again.
Something this patch should prevent from. Could you try to apply [1]
which will make __dump_page more robust so that we do not blow up there
and give some more details in return.
Hi Hocko,
I have applied [1] and attached the dmesg file.
Thanks so the log confirms that this is really an unitialized struct
page
[ 12.228622] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
[ 12.231474] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
[ 12.232135] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 12.232649] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1020!
So now, we have to find out what has been left behind. Please see my
other email. Also could you give me faddr2line of the
is_mem_section_removable offset please? I assume it is
is_pageblock_removable_nolock:
if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page)))
return false;
faddr2line result:
is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0:
page_to_nid at include/linux/mm.h:1020
(inlined by) is_pageblock_removable_nolock at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1221
(inlined by) is_mem_section_removable at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1241
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
