Hi, On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 8/6/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > > Remove the __STRICT_ANSI__ check from the __u64/__s64 declaration on > > > 32bit targets. > > > > > > Here is the reason why we think the check should be relaxed: > > > > I think the fact that "long long" was made official C in C99 is good > > enough. Flagging them as __extension__ is okay, I guess, but something > > like this should definitely go in. > > the patch we (Gentoo) tried posting a while ago never saw any response: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo/src/patchsets/gentoo-headers/2.6.22/35_all_c99-types.patch?rev=1.2 That would still make it not work with programs compiled with just -ansi or -std=c90 (both being equivalent) with -pedantic added. There still are such. Only for that case is the __extension__ prefix necessary. Ciao, Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
