On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:46:36AM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote: > 2007/8/6, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > (..) > > please try Jarek's second patch too - there was a missing unmask. > > > > Ingo > > > > --------------> > > Subject: genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers > > From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > Network card still locks up (tested on 2.6.22.1). I had to upload more > data than usual (~350 MB vs ~1-100 MB) to trigger that bug but it > might be a coincidence...
Thanks! It's a good news after all - it would be really strange why this place doesn't hit more people (it seems there is some safety elsewhere for this). BTW: I hope, this previous Thomas' patch with Ingo's warning to resend.c (with a warning), had no problems with a similar load? So, once more, I would suspect hw retrigger code. Ingo, IMHO, this patch for testing HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND could be reworked, so that desc->chip->retrigger() is done only for eadges and the tasklet only for levels. BTW, I think this current warning in the "temporary" is is too early - we don't know if after this the ->retrigger() will take place. Regards, Jarek P. PS: Marcin, if you need a break in this testing let us know! I think the main idea of this bug is known enough. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
