Alan Cox wrote: [ compiler for 2.4 kernels] > Red Hat's 2.96 seems to generate valid kernels but don't expect > sympathy if you report a bug in one built that way No sympathy? More like "lots of sympathy": "Ahhhh. Poor soul...." :-) Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- recommended gcc compiler version Robert B. Easter
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Matthew D. Pitts
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Tim Wright
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Linus Torvalds
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Matthew Vanecek
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Barry K. Nathan
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Andreas Dilger
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Alan Cox
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Rogier Wolff
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Kai Henningsen
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Linus Torvalds