Alan Cox wrote:
[ compiler for 2.4 kernels]
> Red Hat's 2.96 seems to generate valid kernels but don't expect
> sympathy if you report a bug in one built that way
No sympathy? More like "lots of sympathy": "Ahhhh. Poor soul...."
:-)
Roger.
--
** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots.
* There are also old, bald pilots.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- recommended gcc compiler version Robert B. Easter
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Matthew D. Pitts
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Tim Wright
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Linus Torvalds
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Matthew Vanecek
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Barry K. Nathan
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Andreas Dilger
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Alan Cox
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Rogier Wolff
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Kai Henningsen
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: recommended gcc compiler version Linus Torvalds

