On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:41:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 02:26:53AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I always thought the right solution would be to just sync atime only > > very very lazily. This means if a inode is only dirty because of an > > atime update put it on a "only write out when there is nothing to do > > or the memory is really needed" list. > > Which is the policy I implemented for XFS a while ago.
How would that work? I didn't think XFS had separate inode lists. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
