In non-smp configuration, hartid can be higher that NR_CPUS.
riscv_of_processor_hartid should not be compared to hartid to
NR_CPUS in that case. Moreover, this function checks all the
DT properties of a hart node. NR_CPUS comparison seems out of
place.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <a...@brainfault.org>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
index f8fa2c63..19edaeae 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node)
pr_warn("Found CPU without hart ID\n");
return -(ENODEV);
}
- if (hart >= NR_CPUS) {
- pr_info("Found hart ID %d, which is above NR_CPUs. Disabling
this hart\n", hart);
- return -(ENODEV);
- }
if (of_property_read_string(node, "status", &status)) {
pr_warn("CPU with hartid=%d has no \"status\" property\n",
hart);
--
2.7.4
