Hi Miquel,

Hi Paul,

Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net> wrote on Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:04:25
-0300:

 The boot ROM of the JZ4725B SoC expects a specific OOB layout on the
 NAND, so we use it unconditionally in the ingenic-nand driver.

 Also add the jz4725b-bch driver to support the JZ4725B-specific BCH
 hardware.

 Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
 ---

 Changes:

 v2: Instead of forcing the OOB layout, leave it to the board code or
devicetree to decide if the jz4725b-specific layout should be used
     or not.

v3: - Revert the change in v2, as the previous behaviour was correct.
     - Also add support for the hardware BCH of the JZ4725B in this
       patch.

  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig        |  10 ++
  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile       |   1 +
  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.c |  48 +++++-
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig
 index cc663cc15119..497b46b144f2 100644
 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig
 @@ -27,6 +27,16 @@ config MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC
          This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
          will be called jz4740-ecc.

 +config MTD_NAND_JZ4725B_BCH
 +      tristate "Hardware BCH support for JZ4725B SoC"
 +      select MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC
 +      help
 +        Enable this driver to support the BCH error-correction hardware
 +        present on the JZ4725B SoC from Ingenic.
 +
 +        This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
 +        will be called jz4725b-bch.
 +
  config MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH
        tristate "Hardware BCH support for JZ4780 SoC"
        select MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 index 563b7effcf59..ab2c5f47e5b7 100644
 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile
 @@ -3,4 +3,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780) += ingenic_nand.o

  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) += ingenic_ecc.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC) += jz4740_ecc.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4725B_BCH) += jz4725b_bch.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH) += jz4780_bch.o
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.c
 index 3fd078920b17..0e6d79993ff3 100644
 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.c
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.c
 @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct jz_soc_info {
        unsigned long data_offset;
        unsigned long addr_offset;
        unsigned long cmd_offset;
 +      const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops *oob_layout;
  };

  struct ingenic_nand_cs {
@@ -71,6 +72,41 @@ static inline struct ingenic_nfc *to_ingenic_nfc(struct nand_controller *ctrl)
        return container_of(ctrl, struct ingenic_nfc, controller);
  }

 +static int jz4725b_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 +                               struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
 +{
 +      struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
 +      struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
 +
 +      if (section || !ecc->total)
 +              return -ERANGE;
 +
 +      oobregion->length = ecc->total;
 +      oobregion->offset = 3;
 +
 +      return 0;
 +}
 +
+static int jz4725b_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 +                                struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
 +{
 +      struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
 +      struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
 +
 +      if (section)
 +              return -ERANGE;
 +
 +      oobregion->length = mtd->oobsize - ecc->total - 3;
 +      oobregion->offset = 3 + ecc->total;
 +
 +      return 0;
 +}
 +
 +const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops jz4725b_ooblayout_ops = {
 +      .ecc = jz4725b_ooblayout_ecc,
 +      .free = jz4725b_ooblayout_free,
 +};
 +
static void ingenic_nand_select_chip(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr)
  {
        struct ingenic_nand *nand = to_ingenic_nand(nand_to_mtd(chip));
@@ -211,7 +247,7 @@ static int ingenic_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
                return -EINVAL;
        }

 -      mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops);
 +      mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nfc->soc_info->oob_layout);

        return 0;
  }
@@ -407,16 +443,26 @@ static const struct jz_soc_info jz4740_soc_info = {
        .data_offset = 0x00000000,
        .cmd_offset  = 0x00008000,
        .addr_offset = 0x00010000,
 +      .oob_layout = &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops,
 +};
 +
 +static const struct jz_soc_info jz4725b_soc_info = {
 +      .data_offset = 0x00000000,
 +      .cmd_offset  = 0x00008000,
 +      .addr_offset = 0x00010000,
 +      .oob_layout = &jz4725b_ooblayout_ops,
  };

  static const struct jz_soc_info jz4780_soc_info = {
        .data_offset = 0x00000000,
        .cmd_offset  = 0x00400000,
        .addr_offset = 0x00800000,
 +      .oob_layout = &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops,
  };

  static const struct of_device_id ingenic_nand_dt_match[] = {
        { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-nand", .data = &jz4740_soc_info },
+ { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-nand", .data = &jz4725b_soc_info }, { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-nand", .data = &jz4780_soc_info },
        {},
  };
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c
 new file mode 100644
 index 000000000000..66be454be383
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c
 @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
 +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 +/*
 + * JZ4725B BCH controller driver
 + *
 + * Copyright (C) 2018 Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
 + *
 + * Based on jz4780_bch.c
 + */
 +
 +#include <linux/bitops.h>
 +#include <linux/device.h>
 +#include <linux/io.h>
 +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 +#include <linux/module.h>
 +#include <linux/mutex.h>
 +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
 +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
 +
 +#include "ingenic_ecc.h"
 +
 +#define BCH_BHCR                      0x0
 +#define BCH_BHCSR                     0x4
 +#define BCH_BHCCR                     0x8
 +#define BCH_BHCNT                     0xc
 +#define BCH_BHDR                      0x10
 +#define BCH_BHPAR0                    0x14
 +#define BCH_BHERR0                    0x28
 +#define BCH_BHINT                     0x24
 +#define BCH_BHINTES                   0x3c
 +#define BCH_BHINTEC                   0x40
 +#define BCH_BHINTE                    0x38
 +
 +#define BCH_BHCR_BSEL_SHIFT           2
 +#define BCH_BHCR_BSEL_MASK            (0x1 << BCH_BHCR_BSEL_SHIFT)
 +#define BCH_BHCR_ENCE                 BIT(3)
 +#define BCH_BHCR_INIT                 BIT(1)
 +#define BCH_BHCR_BCHE                 BIT(0)
 +
 +#define BCH_BHCNT_DEC_COUNT_SHIFT     16
+#define BCH_BHCNT_DEC_COUNT_MASK (0x3ff << BCH_BHCNT_DEC_COUNT_SHIFT)
 +#define BCH_BHCNT_ENC_COUNT_SHIFT     0
+#define BCH_BHCNT_ENC_COUNT_MASK (0x3ff << BCH_BHCNT_ENC_COUNT_SHIFT)
 +
 +#define BCH_BHERR_INDEX0_SHIFT                0
 +#define BCH_BHERR_INDEX0_MASK         (0x1fff << BCH_BHERR_INDEX0_SHIFT)
 +#define BCH_BHERR_INDEX1_SHIFT                16
 +#define BCH_BHERR_INDEX1_MASK         (0x1fff << BCH_BHERR_INDEX1_SHIFT)
 +
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ERRC_SHIFT          28
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ERRC_MASK           (0xf << BCH_BHINT_ERRC_SHIFT)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_TERRC_SHIFT         16
 +#define BCH_BHINT_TERRC_MASK          (0x7f << BCH_BHINT_TERRC_SHIFT)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ALL_0                       BIT(5)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ALL_F                       BIT(4)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_DECF                        BIT(3)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ENCF                        BIT(2)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_UNCOR                       BIT(1)
 +#define BCH_BHINT_ERR                 BIT(0)
 +
 +/* Timeout for BCH calculation/correction. */
 +#define BCH_TIMEOUT_US                        100000
 +
 +static void jz4725b_bch_init(struct ingenic_ecc *bch,
 +                           struct ingenic_ecc_params *params, bool encode)

I don't know the IP but 'encode' looks strange, what is it supposed to
mean?

It is used to toggle between calculating the ECC codes for a given set of data,
and using supplied ECC codes to verify a set of data.

I just reused the function and parameter names that were used in the
jz4780-bch driver, that's where the 'encode' comes from.

 +{
 +      u32 reg;
 +
 +      /* Clear interrupt status. */
 +      writel(readl(bch->base + BCH_BHINT), bch->base + BCH_BHINT);
 +
 +      /* Initialise and enable BCH. */
 +      writel(0x1f, bch->base + BCH_BHCCR);
 +      writel(BCH_BHCR_BCHE, bch->base + BCH_BHCSR);
 +
 +      if (params->strength == 8)
 +              writel(BCH_BHCR_BSEL_MASK, bch->base + BCH_BHCSR);
 +      else
 +              writel(BCH_BHCR_BSEL_MASK, bch->base + BCH_BHCCR);

Here you write to BCH_BHCSR or BCH_BHCCR depending on
params->strength...

 +
 +      if (encode)
 +              writel(BCH_BHCR_ENCE, bch->base + BCH_BHCSR);
 +      else
 +              writel(BCH_BHCR_ENCE, bch->base + BCH_BHCCR);

...and here depending on encode.

Can you explain a bit?

BCH_BHCSR / BCH_BHCCR are set and clear registers for the BCH_BHCR
register, which is itself read-only. The BSEL field is used to toggle
between a strength of 4 (if cleared) and 8 (if set), while the ENCE
field configures the IP for 'encoding' mode.

 +
 +      writel(BCH_BHCR_INIT, bch->base + BCH_BHCSR);
 +
 +      /* Set up BCH count register. */
 +      reg = params->size << BCH_BHCNT_ENC_COUNT_SHIFT;
+ reg |= (params->size + params->bytes) << BCH_BHCNT_DEC_COUNT_SHIFT;

Maybe you want to check params->size to fit the bitfield length?

I guess I could do that, yes.

 +      writel(reg, bch->base + BCH_BHCNT);
 +}
 +
 +static void jz4725b_bch_disable(struct ingenic_ecc *bch)
 +{
 +      writel(readl(bch->base + BCH_BHINT), bch->base + BCH_BHINT);
 +      writel(BCH_BHCR_BCHE, bch->base + BCH_BHCCR);

I would add comments, one to say you clear the interrupts, one when you
disable the engine.

OK.

 +}
 +
+static void jz4725b_bch_write_data(struct ingenic_ecc *bch, const u8 *buf,
 +                                 size_t size)
 +{
 +      while (size--)
 +              writeb(*buf++, bch->base + BCH_BHDR);
 +}
 +
+static void jz4725b_bch_read_parity(struct ingenic_ecc *bch, u8 *buf,
 +                                  size_t size)
 +{
 +      size_t size32 = size / sizeof(u32);
 +      size_t size8 = size % sizeof(u32);
 +      u32 *dest32;
 +      u8 *dest8;
 +      u32 val, offset = 0;
 +
 +      dest32 = (u32 *)buf;
 +      while (size32--) {
 +              *dest32++ = readl(bch->base + BCH_BHPAR0 + offset);
 +              offset += sizeof(u32);
 +      }
 +
 +      dest8 = (u8 *)dest32;
 +      val = readl(bch->base + BCH_BHPAR0 + offset);
 +      switch (size8) {
 +      case 3:
 +              dest8[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
 +      case 2:
 +              dest8[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xff;
 +      case 1:
 +              dest8[0] = val & 0xff;
 +              break;
 +      }
 +}

Have you tried with _relaxed operators?

Never heard about these :)

 +
+static bool jz4725b_bch_wait_complete(struct ingenic_ecc *bch, unsigned int irq,
 +                                    u32 *status)
 +{
 +      u32 reg;
 +      int ret;
 +
 +      /*
+ * While we could use interrupts here and sleep until the operation
 +       * completes, the controller works fairly quickly (usually a few
 +       * microseconds) and so the overhead of sleeping until we get an
 +       * interrupt quite noticeably decreases performance.
 +       */
 +      ret = readl_poll_timeout(bch->base + BCH_BHINT, reg,
 +                               (reg & irq) == irq, 0, BCH_TIMEOUT_US);

I suppose (reg & irq) is enough?

 +      if (ret)
 +              return false;
 +
 +      if (status)
 +              *status = reg;
 +
 +      writel(reg, bch->base + BCH_BHINT);

space

 +      return true;
 +}
 +
 +static int jz4725b_calculate(struct ingenic_ecc *bch,
 +                           struct ingenic_ecc_params *params,
 +                           const u8 *buf, u8 *ecc_code)
 +{
 +      int ret = 0;
 +
 +      mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
 +      jz4725b_bch_init(bch, params, true);
 +      jz4725b_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
 +
 +      if (jz4725b_bch_wait_complete(bch, BCH_BHINT_ENCF, NULL)) {

I would prefer bch_wait_complete() to return an usual negative error
instead of a boolean.

And maybe a goto could be used in case of error to disable BCH, unlock
the mutex and return.

OK.

 +              jz4725b_bch_read_parity(bch, ecc_code, params->bytes);
 +      } else {
 +              dev_err(bch->dev, "timed out while calculating ECC\n");
 +              ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 +      }
 +
 +      jz4725b_bch_disable(bch);
 +      mutex_unlock(&bch->lock);

Space

 +      return ret;
 +}
 +
 +static int jz4725b_correct(struct ingenic_ecc *bch,
 +                         struct ingenic_ecc_params *params,
 +                         u8 *buf, u8 *ecc_code)
 +{
 +      u32 reg, errors, bit;
 +      unsigned int i;
 +      int ret = 0;
 +
 +      mutex_lock(&bch->lock);
 +
 +      jz4725b_bch_init(bch, params, false);
 +      jz4725b_bch_write_data(bch, buf, params->size);
 +      jz4725b_bch_write_data(bch, ecc_code, params->bytes);
 +
 +      if (!jz4725b_bch_wait_complete(bch, BCH_BHINT_DECF, &reg)) {
 +              dev_err(bch->dev, "timed out while correcting data\n");
 +              ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
 +              goto out;
 +      }
 +
 +      if (reg & (BCH_BHINT_ALL_F | BCH_BHINT_ALL_0)) {
 +              /* Data and ECC is all 0xff or 0x00 - nothing to correct */
 +              ret = 0;
 +              goto out;
 +      }
 +
 +      if (reg & BCH_BHINT_UNCOR) {
 +              /* Uncorrectable ECC error */
 +              ret = -EBADMSG;
 +              goto out;
 +      }
 +
 +      errors = (reg & BCH_BHINT_ERRC_MASK) >> BCH_BHINT_ERRC_SHIFT;
 +
 +      /* Correct any detected errors. */
 +      for (i = 0; i < errors; i++) {
 +              if (i & 1) {
 +                      bit = (reg & BCH_BHERR_INDEX1_MASK) >> 
BCH_BHERR_INDEX1_SHIFT;
 +              } else {
 +                      reg = readl(bch->base + BCH_BHERR0 + (i * 4));
 +                      bit = (reg & BCH_BHERR_INDEX0_MASK) >> 
BCH_BHERR_INDEX0_SHIFT;
 +              }
 +
 +              buf[(bit >> 3)] ^= BIT(bit & 0x7);
 +      }
 +
 +out:
 +      jz4725b_bch_disable(bch);
 +      mutex_unlock(&bch->lock);
 +      return ret;
 +}
 +
 +static const struct ingenic_ecc_ops jz4725b_bch_ops = {
 +      .disable = jz4725b_bch_disable,
 +      .calculate = jz4725b_calculate,
 +      .correct = jz4725b_correct,
 +};
 +
 +static const struct of_device_id jz4725b_bch_dt_match[] = {
 +      { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-bch", .data = &jz4725b_bch_ops },
 +      {},
 +};
 +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, jz4725b_bch_dt_match);
 +
 +static struct platform_driver jz4725b_bch_driver = {
 +      .probe          = ingenic_ecc_probe,
 +      .driver = {
 +              .name   = "jz4725b-bch",
 +              .of_match_table = jz4725b_bch_dt_match,
 +      },
 +};
 +module_platform_driver(jz4725b_bch_driver);

Missing MODULE_ macros? (author, license)

You're right, I will add them.

Thanks,
-Paul

Reply via email to