4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>

commit 2486e67374aa8b7854c2de32869642c2873b3d53 upstream.

When multiple instances of pcf857x chips are present, a fix up
message [1] is printed during the probe of the 2nd and later
instances.

The issue is that the driver is using the same irq_chip data
structure between multiple instances.

Fix this by allocating the irq_chip data structure per instance.

[1] fix up message addressed by this patch
[    1.212100] gpio gpiochip9: (pcf8575): detected irqchip that is shared with 
multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.

Cc: Stable <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c |   26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcf857x_of_table
  */
 struct pcf857x {
        struct gpio_chip        chip;
+       struct irq_chip         irqchip;
        struct i2c_client       *client;
        struct mutex            lock;           /* protect 'out' */
        unsigned                out;            /* software latch */
@@ -252,18 +253,6 @@ static void pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(
        mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
 }
 
-static struct irq_chip pcf857x_irq_chip = {
-       .name           = "pcf857x",
-       .irq_enable     = pcf857x_irq_enable,
-       .irq_disable    = pcf857x_irq_disable,
-       .irq_ack        = noop,
-       .irq_mask       = noop,
-       .irq_unmask     = noop,
-       .irq_set_wake   = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
-       .irq_bus_lock           = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
-       .irq_bus_sync_unlock    = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
-};
-
 /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
 
 static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
@@ -376,8 +365,17 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_clie
 
        /* Enable irqchip if we have an interrupt */
        if (client->irq) {
+               gpio->irqchip.name = "pcf857x",
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_enable = pcf857x_irq_enable,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_disable = pcf857x_irq_disable,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_ack = noop,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_mask = noop,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_unmask = noop,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_set_wake = pcf857x_irq_set_wake,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_lock = pcf857x_irq_bus_lock,
+               gpio->irqchip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = pcf857x_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
                status = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->chip,
-                                                    &pcf857x_irq_chip,
+                                                    &gpio->irqchip,
                                                     0, handle_level_irq,
                                                     IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
                if (status) {
@@ -392,7 +390,7 @@ static int pcf857x_probe(struct i2c_clie
                if (status)
                        goto fail;
 
-               gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &pcf857x_irq_chip,
+               gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->chip, &gpio->irqchip,
                                            client->irq);
                gpio->irq_parent = client->irq;
        }


Reply via email to