On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 08:58:25 +0000
<tudor.amba...@microchip.com> wrote:
> >> @@ -117,6 +120,7 @@
> >> #define QSPI_IFR_CRM BIT(14)
> >> #define QSPI_IFR_NBDUM_MASK GENMASK(20, 16)
> >> #define QSPI_IFR_NBDUM(n) (((n) << 16) &
> >> QSPI_IFR_NBDUM_MASK)
> >> +#define QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ BIT(24)
> >
> > Maybe add a comment saying it's only available on SAM9X60 or prefix it
> > with SAM9X60.
>
> I'll add a comment. The macro name is more generic how it is now and can be
> used
> by future versions of the IP. Hypothetically speaking, if we rename it to
> QSPI_IFR_SAM9x60_TFSFR_READ and other sam9x will come out, then I'll have to
> rename this macro again, to make it more generic.
Okay.
> >> +static int atmel_qspi_set_cfg(struct atmel_qspi *aq,
> >> + const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> >> + struct atmel_qspi_cfg *cfg)
> >> +{
> >> + void __iomem *base = aq->regs;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* Set the QSPI controller in Serial Memory Mode */
> >> + if (aq->smm != QSPI_MR_SMM) {
> >> + writel_relaxed(QSPI_MR_SMM, base + QSPI_MR);
> >
> > aq->reqs +
> >
> > and you can get rid of base.
>
> I will wait your reasons on this, see 3/13
ad->regs is only dereferenced once in this function, so there's even
less reasons to add a local var.
