On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 14:49:27 +0000
<tudor.amba...@microchip.com> wrote:

> 
> >>>> +#define QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ         BIT(24)  
> > 
> > And this one would be
> > 
> > define QSPI_IFR_SAM9X60_READ_TRSFR          BIT(24)  
> 
> I prefer letting this bit named as in the datasheet, QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ,
> and change it if future versions of the IP will modify its sense. It is a READ
> transfer done on APB, it is more generic this way. If you have a strong 
> opinion
> on this, please let me know.

As you wish.

Reply via email to