On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:31:32PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > As the comments for wake_up_bit() and waitqueue_active() point out,
> > the barriers are needed to order the clearing of the _FL_NOT_READY
> > bit and the waitqueue_active() load; match the implicit barrier in
> > prepare_to_wait().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.pa...@amarulasolutions.com>
>
> Hi David, do you have any feedback on this?
ping
>
> Andrea
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/afs/cell.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/afs/cell.c b/fs/afs/cell.c
> > index cf445dbd5f2e0..a9488abe56029 100644
> > --- a/fs/afs/cell.c
> > +++ b/fs/afs/cell.c
> > @@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ static void afs_manage_cell(struct work_struct *work)
> > cell->state = AFS_CELL_ACTIVE;
> > smp_wmb();
> > clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_READY, &cell->flags);
> > + smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* see comment for wake_up_bit() */
> > wake_up_bit(&cell->flags, AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_READY);
> > goto again;
> >
> > @@ -678,6 +679,7 @@ static void afs_manage_cell(struct work_struct *work)
> > cell->state = AFS_CELL_ACTIVE;
> > smp_wmb();
> > clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_READY, &cell->flags);
> > + smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* see comment for wake_up_bit() */
> > wake_up_bit(&cell->flags, AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_READY);
> > _leave(" [deact->act]");
> > return;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
