On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:47:56AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
>
>On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> On Aug 2 2007 21:55, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > struct {
>> > char c[4];
>> > int i;
>> > } t;
>> > t.i = 0x12345678;
>> > strcpy(t.c, c);
>> >
>> >and t.i is silently corrupted. Just wanted to ask if this is known,
>> >really...
>>
>> What does this have to do with the kernel? The string "0123" is
>> generally _five_ characters long, so c[4] is not enough.
>> Or use strncpy.
>
><nitpicking>
>
>While we're talking of null-termination of strings, then I bet you
>generally want to be using strlcpy(), really. Often strncpy() isn't
>what you want. Of course, if that buffer isn't a string at all, then
>you should be using memfoo() functions and not strbar() ones in the
>first place ...
Afaik, strlcpy() and strlcat() are NOT standard C library functions.
But, I know, they are available in Linux kernel. ;) And yes, they
are better than strn{cpy,cat}().
Regards.
--
_ /|
\'o.O'
=(___)=
U
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
