On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:21:02PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:41:11PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > > never do something different based on this. > > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> > > Cc: Peng Donglin <dolinux.p...@gmail.com> > > Cc: <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/ptdump.h | 9 +++------ > > arch/arm64/mm/dump.c | 4 ++-- > > arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c | 7 ++----- > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > Are you taking this via your tree, or would you like us to queue it in > arm64?
What ever is easiest for you is fine with me, I can handle it either way, just let me know. thanks, greg k-h
