Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug?

[Igmar Palsenberg]

> > What's the problem with using PID 0 as the idle task ? That's 'standard'
> > with OS'ses that display the idle task.
> 
> Linux has already another thread with pid 0, called "swapper" which is
> in fact idle. kidle-apmd is different beast.

Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two
idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a
separate apm idle task has a purpose. 

>                                                               Pavel


        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/