On 2019-01-29 12:44 p.m., Jerome Glisse wrote: >> I'd suggest [1] should be a part of the patchset so we can actually see >> a user of the stuff you're adding. > > I did not wanted to clutter patchset with device driver specific usage > of this. As the API can be reason about in abstract way. It's hard to reason about an interface when you can't see what all the layers want to do with it. Most maintainers (I'd hope) would certainly never merge code that has no callers, and for much the same reason, I'd rather not review patches that don't have real use case examples. Logan
- [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: add a function to test pe... jglisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: add a function t... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: add a functi... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: add a function t... Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] drivers/base: add a functi... Jerome Glisse
- [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to... jglisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer t... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for pe... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support fo... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add suppor... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add s... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support fo... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add suppor... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add s... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: a... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add suppor... Logan Gunthorpe