Hi!
> Well, it would not be the first time to eliminate a regression by
> reverting a
> patch after it was accepted previously.
> >> Sanity checks that trip points only can get lowered (compared to initial
> >> provided ones) needs to be added.
> >> Len, Rui: For short-term can some
> But I _need_ to raise the unreasonably low passive trip point. We could
> decide to
> protect the innocent user by allowing write access to trip_points only
> after a previous
Actually, you should lower your active trip point, and keep cpu temp
below 50C.
> echo "I know what I am doing" >
> /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/enable_really_dangerous_options
No... but patch that only permits lowering could be acceptable.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
