Re: iptables: "stateful inspection?"

[Michael Rothwell]

Alan Cox wrote:

> There have been at least five holes found in pile that _could_ have been
> [speech]
> safe is the day you end up hurt.

Your specific example of an executable (windows) attachment, not buffer
overflows, etc. what what I was replying to. In general, you are
correct. Now, how about including that procfs cleanup patch that I sent,
and maybe the 64-bit printk patch? :)

-M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/