On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:27 +0100
Michael Mueller <m...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The explicit else path specified in set_intercept_indicators_io
> is not required as the function returns in case the first branch
> is taken anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <m...@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index fcb55b02990e..19d556512452 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_io(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu)
> {
> if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_IO_MASK))
> return;
> - else if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
> + if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
> kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_IO_INT);
> else
> vcpu->arch.sie_block->lctl |= LCTL_CR6;
