Currently each PCI device under a PCI Bridge shares the same device id and ITS device. Assume there are two PCI devices call its_msi_prepare concurrently and they are both going to find and create their ITS device. There is a chance that the later one couldn't find ITS device before the other one creating the ITS device. It will cause the later one to create a different ITS device even if they have the same device_id.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Xiang <zhengxia...@huawei.com> --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 52 +++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index db20e99..397edc8 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -2205,25 +2205,6 @@ static void its_cpu_init_collections(void) raw_spin_unlock(&its_lock); } -static struct its_device *its_find_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id) -{ - struct its_device *its_dev = NULL, *tmp; - unsigned long flags; - - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags); - - list_for_each_entry(tmp, &its->its_device_list, entry) { - if (tmp->device_id == dev_id) { - its_dev = tmp; - break; - } - } - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags); - - return its_dev; -} - static struct its_baser *its_get_baser(struct its_node *its, u32 type) { int i; @@ -2321,7 +2302,7 @@ static bool its_alloc_vpe_table(u32 vpe_id) static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id, int nvecs, bool alloc_lpis) { - struct its_device *dev; + struct its_device *dev = NULL, *tmp; unsigned long *lpi_map = NULL; unsigned long flags; u16 *col_map = NULL; @@ -2331,6 +2312,24 @@ static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id, int nr_ites; int sz; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags); + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &its->its_device_list, entry) { + if (tmp->device_id == dev_id) { + dev = tmp; + break; + } + } + if (dev) { + /* + * We already have seen this ID, probably through + * another alias (PCI bridge of some sort). No need to + * create the device. + */ + pr_debug("Reusing ITT for devID %x\n", dev_id); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags); + return dev; + } + if (!its_alloc_device_table(its, dev_id)) return NULL; @@ -2378,7 +2377,6 @@ static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id, dev->device_id = dev_id; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->entry); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&its->lock, flags); list_add(&dev->entry, &its->its_device_list); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&its->lock, flags); @@ -2443,23 +2441,11 @@ static int its_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev, return -EINVAL; } - its_dev = its_find_device(its, dev_id); - if (its_dev) { - /* - * We already have seen this ID, probably through - * another alias (PCI bridge of some sort). No need to - * create the device. - */ - pr_debug("Reusing ITT for devID %x\n", dev_id); - goto out; - } - its_dev = its_create_device(its, dev_id, nvec, true); if (!its_dev) return -ENOMEM; pr_debug("ITT %d entries, %d bits\n", nvec, ilog2(nvec)); -out: info->scratchpad[0].ptr = its_dev; return 0; } -- 1.8.3.1