On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 03:58:48 -0400 "Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:09:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > - Is anyone testing the kgdb code in here? > > > > Testing, yes. Succeeding, no. It's utterly hosed on SH in its present > > condition at least. Presumably it's been tested on at least one platform > > with some measure of success, but it's certainly not mine ;-) > > does kgdb actually have a chance to get merged ? I was hoping for a 2.6.24 merge. But I haven't actually looked at it yet. Hopefully Jason is planning to get it all out for review soonish. > with the history of > it, i just assumed it was never going in, so we've been using our own > kgdb patch on Blackfin ... so the version *we have* works great :) but > if there's a chance of this actually going mainline, we can see about > testing that version as well ... Please, do so. But runtime testing isn't actually the most important thing at this time - if is doesn't work, well hey, we fix it, easy - we always have bugs. The main emphasis right now should be on higher-level design/review/integration stuff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
