On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 19:59 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote:
> There is no need to create the inner domain as a parent for MSI domian,
> some feature has been implemented by MSI framework.
> 
> Remove the inner domain and its irq chip, it will be more closer to the
> hardware implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 82 +++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> index 8d05df56158b..216e6fa8aec0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc {
>   * @slot: port slot
>   * @irq: GIC irq
>   * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain
> - * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain
>   * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain
>   * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap
>   * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ
> @@ -190,7 +189,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port {
>       u32 slot;
>       int irq;
>       struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> -     struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
>       struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
>       struct mutex lock;
>       DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM);
> @@ -418,22 +416,25 @@ static void mtk_msi_ack_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>       u32 hwirq = data->hwirq;
>  
>       writel(1 << hwirq, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
> +     writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
>  }
>  
> -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
> -     .name                   = "MTK MSI",
> +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
> +     .name                   = "MTK PCIe",
>       .irq_compose_msi_msg    = mtk_compose_msi_msg,
> +     .irq_write_msi_msg      = pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
>       .irq_set_affinity       = mtk_msi_set_affinity,
>       .irq_ack                = mtk_msi_ack_irq,
> +     .irq_mask               = pci_msi_mask_irq,
> +     .irq_unmask             = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
>  };

(...omitted...)

To keep the patch simple, we don't need to adjust the position for
mtk_msi_irq_chip.

> -
> -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
> -     .name           = "MTK PCIe MSI",
> -     .irq_ack        = irq_chip_ack_parent,
> -     .irq_mask       = pci_msi_mask_irq,
> -     .irq_unmask     = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
> +static struct msi_domain_ops mtk_msi_domain_ops = {
> +     .get_hwirq      = mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq,
> +     .msi_free       = mtk_pcie_msi_free,
>  };
>  
>  static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = {
> -     .flags  = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> -                MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
> -     .chip   = &mtk_msi_irq_chip,
> +     .flags          = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |
> +                        MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
> +     .ops            = &mtk_msi_domain_ops,
> +     .chip           = &mtk_msi_irq_chip,
> +     .handler        = handle_edge_irq,
> +     .handler_name   = "MSI",
>  };
>  


Reply via email to