On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 18/01/2019 04:24, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > This adds a property "mediatek,num-pwms" in example so that we could
> > set the number of PWM channels via device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder....@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1: add a Reviewed-by tag.
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mediatek.txt | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mediatek.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mediatek.txt
> > index 991728c..f9e2d1f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mediatek.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mediatek.txt
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Required properties:
> > - pinctrl-names: Must contain a "default" entry.
> > - pinctrl-0: One property must exist for each entry in pinctrl-names.
> > See pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt for details of the property values.
> > + - mediatek,num-pwms: the number of PWM channels.
> >
> > Example:
> > pwm0: pwm@11006000 {
> > @@ -37,4 +38,5 @@ Example:
> > "pwm3", "pwm4", "pwm5";
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pins>;
> > + mediatek,num-pwms = <5>;
> > };
> >
>
> Wasn't there a comment in the last version to use num-pwms instead of
> mediatek,num-pwms?
>
> Uwe I think you requested that.
I think it is sensible, but it needs Thierry's blessing. Unfortunately
he seems busy with other stuff and getting feedback from him needs
patience.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
