In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> I think the semantics of the filesystem specific ->flush and ->writepage >> are not the same. >> >> Is ok for filesystem specific writepage() code to sync other "physically >> contiguous" dirty pages with reference to the one requested by >> writepage() ? >> >> If so, it can do the same job as the ->flush() idea we've discussing. > > Except that for ->writepage you don't have the option of *not* writing > the specified page. In current -test13pre you have. Christoph -- Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Russell Cattelan
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Chris Mason
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Russell Cattelan
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Daniel Phillips
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error. Marcelo Tosatti
- [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_r... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Alexander Viro
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Tes... Chris Mason