On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:57 PM Andreas Kemnade <andr...@kemnade.info> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:07:34 +0100
> Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > >>>> Btw. I see nothing standing in the way of merging btuart.c driver and 
> > >>>> then go from there. Either I dig this out and submit or someone else 
> > >>>> does.
> > >>>>
> > >>> Do you mean this?
> > >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10490651/
> > >>
> > >> yes, that one.
> > >>
> > > Hmm, there seemed to be nothing in the pull requests regarding btuart.
> > > Did you change plans?
> >
> > because I only submitted it as RFC. We can easily merge that one upstream 
> > since it is rather trivial. The main problem is how you want to do the 
> > device matching. Do you have a DT entry for your really simple devices?
> >
> Hmm, in that link it is non-rfc. So someone picked you rfc patch up and
> submitted it?
>
> You might see what we are already doing here:
> http://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi;h=4d2bac4293938de4a15a59979616909cf8842524;hp=bfced960d63ec40cf9db4901374b331737a9a168;hb=f78bf51754e35010de40518b9a8a148d0269bbc8;hpb=b6805813a9ab5b0d66b44cc54a0059eca4dd0a98
>
> We are using compatible = "wi2wi,w2cbw003-bluetooth"
>
> But I think we should also add a generic device string like
> bluetooth,h4
> So if people dig out older hardware, they can just add that to their
> device trees and have bluetooth
>
> The full patchset we are currently using is here:
> http://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/letux/bluetooth-h4-serdev
>
> Regards,
> Andreas

Good timing for this thread.  I have just integrated the mynewt blehci
firmware for the nina-b1 chip integrated onto our SOM.  This is
exactly the functionality I need in the kernel to make the
initialization seamless.  A generic device string is exactly what
would be needed for most devices that are running in this
configuration.  We may also want to have a generic reset_gpio handler.

-Jon

Reply via email to