Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > > Are there blocking lock primitives already defined somewhere in the
> > > > kernel?
> > >
> > > down and up are normally appropriate for this
> >
> > Ungh. Forest. Trees. *sigh* Sorry for the dumb question.
> > Thanks for the reply Alan. :)
> >
> > Ok, second part of the question: What about blocking read/write locks
> > (with _interruptible variants)?
>
> Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking*
>
> Rusty.
> --
> Hacking time.
Perhaps I should have specified that I'm working with 2.2.xy....
I'll d/l a 2.4.0-test and look at the docbook in that. Thanks for the
pointer.
Eli
--------------------. "To the systems programmer, users and applications
Eli Carter | serve only to provide a test load."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] `---------------------------------- (random fortune)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
