From: "Zhang, Jun" <[email protected]>

Currently, __note_gp_changes() checks to see if the rcu_node structure's
->gp_seq_needed is greater than or equal to that of the rcu_data
structure, and if so, updates the rcu_data structure's ->gp_seq_needed
field.  This results in a useless store in the case where the two fields
are equal.

This commit therefore carries out this store only in the case where the
rcu_node structure's ->gp_seq_needed is strictly greater than that of
the rcu_data structure.

Signed-off-by: "Zhang, Jun" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Link: 
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/88dc34334ca3444c85d647dbfa962c2735ad5...@shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 21775eebb8f0..9d0e2ac9356e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ static bool __note_gp_changes(struct rcu_node *rnp, 
struct rcu_data *rdp)
                zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
        }
        rdp->gp_seq = rnp->gp_seq;  /* Remember new grace-period state. */
-       if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp->gp_seq_needed, rdp->gp_seq_needed) || rdp->gpwrap)
+       if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->gp_seq_needed, rnp->gp_seq_needed) || rdp->gpwrap)
                rdp->gp_seq_needed = rnp->gp_seq_needed;
        WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap, false);
        rcu_gpnum_ovf(rnp, rdp);
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to