Hi Rasmus, On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote: > > On 2018-11-02 11:36, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > Hi Rasmus, > > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 2:06 PM Miguel Ojeda > > <miguel.ojeda.sando...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I did quick check and gcc >= 4.1, clang >= 3.0, icc >= 13 compilers > >> seem to support it (or at least recognize it, even if they just ignore > >> it), so we do not need to make it optional, no? Did I miss some case? > > > > compiler-attributes landed -- do you want to do the v2 of this (i.e. > > #defining it unconditionally) or you prefer I simply fix up the patch? > > I'll wait a few more days for comments on fmtcheck(), and allow you to > do the 'optional'/'required' clarification in the meantime. I hope to > get fmtcheck() picked up for -next around -rc3 or so.
Any news about fmtcheck()? The "Optional" clarification landed a few weeks ago, in case you wanted to know. Hopefully it is more clear now. Cheers, Miguel
